Arkansas Expats: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

The Auburn Victory - The Four Factors Perspective

If you are unfamiliar with the Four Factors, you can read our oh-so-authoritative post on the concept by clicking here. For those familiar with the factors, it's interesting to see that Arkansas won Saturday's game while winning only one of them (CORRECTION: As Whit E. Knight notes in the comments thread below, the Razorbacks won two of the factors). The Hogs really have done a remarkable job of getting to the line lately (and shooting well when they get there). That has arguably been the backbone of their success during the past four games. 

0 recs  |  Comment 6 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Not surprising

This backs up my general impression that the Hogs have been playing terribly and still winning. Our defense continues to be abysmal, except in spurts. We are horrible at rebounding, and fail to take care of the ball. We are getting bailed out at the line in large part because Fortson drives in and initiates contact. So . . . with all that we are still leading the West. But Pelphrey certainly knows we have to get some stuff fixed or we are going nowhere. I remain a skeptic.

Arkansas Expats: Acting like the Lost Generation since at least 2007.

by J. Hawg 3 on Feb 8, 2010 5:10 PM CST reply actions  

In the interest of full context ...

If you look at these graphs from the three wins that preceded the Auburn victory, the Hogs fared much better in these stats, usually winning most the factors except for the rebounding one, where they routinely get whipped.

by Stephen Expat on Feb 8, 2010 5:21 PM CST up reply actions  

It does?

I’m not sure any of those stats above imply that we’ve been “playing terribly”. Maybe the rebounding one does, but the rest don’t, at least in comparison.

by dxf04 on Feb 8, 2010 5:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Didn't we win two of the four?

Unless I am understanding the chart wrong, the Hogs’ turnover percentage was lower. And field goal efficiency was close to a tie.

by Whit E. Knight on Feb 9, 2010 10:07 AM CST reply actions  

The turnovers are a bit misleading...

The graph doesn’t go down to zero, so that little sliver represents 16%. I didn’t realize that at first. That’s atrocious, but still better than Auburn. Our “pure shooting” percentage was actually better, but that system rewards 3-pointers, and we all know ’Barn was draining them. So, I guess in a way, you could say we were playing bad… but not worse than Auburn.

by dxf04 on Feb 9, 2010 12:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Arkansas Razorbacks.
Start posting about the Razorbacks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

1024x768_small
Final Diamond Hog Update
1024x768_small
Diamond Hog Update: June 09 - Hogs win the Fayetteville Regional
Small
My new favorite sports writer.
1024x768_small
Diamond Hog Update: June 2

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

In Progress: South Carolina Leads Southern Miss 24-3 In Second Quarter

Photo link

In Progress: Pitt And Utah Scoreless In Second Quarter

Alabama defensive lineman Marcell Dareus (57) catches a pass intended for Texas wide receiver D.J. Monroe (26) during the second quarter of the BCS Championship NCAA college football game in Pasadena, Calif., Thursday, Jan. 7, 2010. Dareus went on to score a touchdown on the play. (AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill)

NCAA Rules Marcell Dareus Must Miss Two Games For Contacting Agent

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Hog_backboard_small Arkansas Expats

Qu1_small Stephen Expat

Wizard_small_small John Expat